Legal Opinion

Scheinman v. Bloch

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 7, 1922PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*405The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

This is a suit by vendees of real estate who have rejected vendors’ deed, to recover back purchase-money paid on account, with expenses of title search and survey under the statute of 1915 (Pamph. L., p. 316), on the ground that the title was defective. The case was tried before a Circuit Court judge without jury and judgment given the vendees, plaintiffs.

The delects in title relied on were that there were three encroachments of parts of buildings over the property lines described in the contract, as revealed by a survey whose accuracy, so…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Herring v. EspositoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
  2. Loeffler v. RoeSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. Kirzenbaum v. PaulusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. Wyatt v. BergenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  5. Fouch v. RollinsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API