Legal Opinion

Hummer v. Buerk

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 6, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On bill, &e.

1Opinion of the Court

Backes, V. C.

This suit is to compel Thomas Buerk, one' of the defendants, to specifically perform his contract to purchase of the complainant his farm,; and to enjoin him from further prosecuting his suit at law for damages for an alleged breach, of the contract.

The complainant is the owner of a small farm made up of six tracts, which the defendant agreed, in writing, to buy and pay. therefor $2,100. On the daj fixed for the transfer the lawyer, employed by the defendant to examine the records, reported that he had found a serious defect in the title of two of the tracts, and also an…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Content v. DaltonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  2. Morris v. EisnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  3. Trapp v. SchaeferNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  4. Shumate v. BisignanoDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API