Legal Opinion
In Re Cleveland
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided September 30, 2008No. 19-01007PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TERRENCE L. MICHAEL, United States Bankruptcy Judge.
Six claims. Four debtors. Three cases. Two claimants. One whale of a dispute. Debtors in each of these Chapter 13 cases (collectively “Debtors”) have filed objections to proofs of claim filed by alleged assignees of their pre-petition debts. 1 Debtors assert that the claims would be unenforceable under applicable law and should be disallowed. Claimants vehemently disagree and bring substantial evidence in support of their cause. The following findings of fact and conclusions of law are made pursuant to Federal Rule of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Raleigh v. Illinois Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Digital Design Group, Inc. v. Information Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Kenman Engineering v. City of UnionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- In Re Robert Ray Harrison and Frankey Daylene Harrison, Debtors. Agricredit Corporation v. Robert Ray Harrison and Frankey Daylene HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- In Re CluffUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re RichterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2012
- Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Lane (In Re Lane)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- In re DeveyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2018
- In re Caesars Entm't Operating Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- In re: Richard R. LaneUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.