Legal Opinion

In re Caesars Entm't Operating Co.

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 30, 2018No. 15 B 1145 (Jointly administered)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. Jurisdiction

The court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(a) and the district court's Internal Operating Procedure 15(a). Because a claim objection is a matter "arising in" a case under Title 11, see In re Montalbano , 486 B.R. 436, 438 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2013) ; In re Tripplett , 115 B.R. 955, 958 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1990), the objection here is a core proceeding - both statutorily, see 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), and constitutionally, see Schmid v. Bank of Am., N.A. , 498 B.R. 221, 223-24 (W.D. Wis. 2013). The court may therefore enter a final judgment. In re Smith , 848…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re WoodruffUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. CR ADVENTURES LLC d/b/a CR-FARMS v. HughesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. In re: Marshall SpiegelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API