In re Caesars Entm't Operating Co.
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
1. Jurisdiction
The court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(a) and the district court's Internal Operating Procedure 15(a). Because a claim objection is a matter "arising in" a case under Title 11, see In re Montalbano , 486 B.R. 436, 438 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2013) ; In re Tripplett , 115 B.R. 955, 958 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1990), the objection here is a core proceeding - both statutorily, see 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), and constitutionally, see Schmid v. Bank of Am., N.A. , 498 B.R. 221, 223-24 (W.D. Wis. 2013). The court may therefore enter a final judgment. In re Smith , 848…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re WoodruffUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- CR ADVENTURES LLC d/b/a CR-FARMS v. HughesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- In re: Marshall SpiegelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022