Legal Opinion

St. Onge v. Concord

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 5, 1949No. 3760PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, C. J.

The plaintiff’s property is located in a “general residence district,” in regard to which the ordinance provides as follows: “In a general residence district no building or premises shall be erected, altered or used for any purpose except 1, Any use permitted in a single residence district; 2, Detached two-family dwelling or pair of semi-detached one-family dwellings.”

Section 10 (c) of the ordinance contains the following exceptions: “Nothing herein shall prevent any dwelling in a general residence or agricultural district existing prior to December 33, 1930, from being altered to provide for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  2. Real Properties, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of East Chicago v. Sinclair Refining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Deardorf v. Board of Adjustment of Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  3. Vannah v. Town of BedfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  4. Governor's Island Club, Inc. v. Town of GilfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. Depue v. City of ClintonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API