Schram v. Cincinnati
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
EPITOMIZED OPINION
MARSHALL, C. J.:
As a result of a change in the grade of a certain street in Cincinnati, in 1909, Schram’s property was injured by interference with ingress and by removing lateral support from the lot. In 1912,- suit was brought for damage on both counts and judgment was rendered for Schram, although the trial judge erroneously instructed the jury to disregard one of the elements as a basis for damage. Schram denies that the causes of action are the same and upon a demurrer to the reply, an agreed statement of facts was drawn up by the parties and submitted to the trial…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- LaBarbera v. BatschOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Buckeye Community Hope Foundation v. City of Cuyahoga FallsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
- West v. American Tel. & Tel. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Dari-Delite, Inc. v. ClecknerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.