Legal Opinion

Schram v. Cincinnati

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1922No. 17198PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EPITOMIZED OPINION

MARSHALL, C. J.:

As a result of a change in the grade of a certain street in Cincinnati, in 1909, Schram’s property was injured by interference with ingress and by removing lateral support from the lot. In 1912,- suit was brought for damage on both counts and judgment was rendered for Schram, although the trial judge erroneously instructed the jury to disregard one of the elements as a basis for damage. Schram denies that the causes of action are the same and upon a demurrer to the reply, an agreed statement of facts was drawn up by the parties and submitted to the trial…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. LaBarbera v. BatschOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Buckeye Community Hope Foundation v. City of Cuyahoga FallsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
  4. West v. American Tel. & Tel. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  5. Dari-Delite, Inc. v. ClecknerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API