Legal Opinion

Yutkin v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 20, 1986No. 86-144PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA

Plaintiffs, Ira and Doris Yutkin, sought a declaration of their rights to recover benefits under the hit-and-run language of an uninsured-motorist policy issued by defendant, the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, for damages incurred when plaintiffs’ automobile crashed after hitting a piece of debris lying on the highway. The trial court entered a declaratory judgment on behalf of plaintiffs, finding that coverage existed.

The parties stipulated that, if called to testify, Ira Yutkin would state that on July 12, 1982, he was driving in the center lane of a highway when his car…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Allied Fidelity Ins. Co. v. LambIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. In re the Arbitration between SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Curtis v. BirchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Ferega v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Blankenbaker v. Great Central Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Milam v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. NormanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. STATE FARM AUTO. INS. CO. v. NormanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Dehnel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  5. Progressive Classic Insurance v. BlaudCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API