Olender v. Crystalline Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County and from orders denying a motion to quash the service of summons and to vacate a judgment by default. G. W. Nieol, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This is an action to recover of defendant $433.01, with interest, money laid out and expended by plaintiff for defendant at the latter’s request. Default of defendant was entered, and judgment rendered according to the prayer of the complaint. Defendant appeals from the judgment and also from orders denying its motion to quash the service of summons, and denying its motion to vacate the judgment by default based on such service.
Appellant is a foreign corporation created and existing under the laws of Great Britain and doing business in California. By an act of the legislature of this state,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Blunt v. Fidelity and Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Keystone Driller Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Willey v. the Benedict Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kaw Boiler Works v. FrymyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Knapp v. Bullock Tractor Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1917
- King Tonopah Mining Co. v. LynchDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1916
- Watts v. D. & B. Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- Winston v. Idaho Hardwood Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.