Keystone Driller Co. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
WRIT OF PROHIBITION to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
This is an application for a writ of prohibition.
The petition, among other things, states that on or about the twenty-ninth day of July, 1901, in the city and county of San Francisco, state of California, the Keystone Driller Company, the petitioner herein, sold and delivered to the Paraiso Oil Company certain machinery known as a “Keystone Driller” for drilling oil-wells, and tools for use in connection therewith, and to secure payment for part of the purchase price thereof the said Paraiso Oil Company executed and delivered to the Keystone Driller Company a certain promissory note for the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pinney v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Pierce v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- McDonald v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ward Land & Stock Co. v. MapesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Ury v. Jewelers Acceptance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Stratton v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Garrett Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- American Copying Co. v. Eureka BazaarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.