Legal Opinion

Blunt v. Fidelity and Casualty Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1904No. S.F. No. 2973PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment. The suit is upon a policy of insurance, of the kind usually designated as an accident policy, issued by the defendant to John P. Blunt for the term of twelve months. It provided that if death should result from an injury within ninety days from the time the injury was received, the defendant would pay to the wife of the insured, if she survived him, the sum of five thousand dollars. The fourth clause of the policy was as follows: “4. In ease of injuries fatal or otherwise intentionally inflicted upon himself by the assured; or inflicted upon himself or…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Sharman v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Boston v. PlummerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  4. Akers v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Burch v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API