Legal Opinion

State v. Lago

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 23, 1992No. 9866PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of arson in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-112 (a), and insurance fraud in violation of General Statutes § 53a-215 (a) (l).1 On appeal, the defendant raises three claims. He contends that the trial court improperly (1) permitted unreliable identification testimony, (2) instructed the jury on the defendant’s failure to call a witness, and (3) found sufficient evidence to convict the defendant of insurance fraud and, therefore, denied his motion for a new trial. We affirm the judgment…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  3. State v. TatumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. State v. KempSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. State v. TheriaultSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. State v. HooksConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. State v. RadzvilowiczConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  4. State v. IngramConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. State v. HamiltonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API