Legal Opinion
Shapiro v. Segal
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 26, 1944PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The plaintiff, a broker, brings an action of contract against the purchasers of real estate, which he had been authorized to sell by. its owner, for a commission of which he alleges he was deprived by the defendants.
A verdict for the defendants was directed on the opening of the plaintiff, who excepted. We assume that the statements of fact, both specific and general, in the following summary of the opening were true and would have been substantiated by testimony. Schleifer v. Worcester North Savings Institution, 306 Mass. 226, 230. Lawless v. Trustees of New York, New Haven & Hartford…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cohen v. AmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Schleifer v. Worcester North Savings InstitutionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Sherman v. Briggs Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Staula v. CarrolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Gormley v. DangelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RogersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Douglas v. WhittakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Grace v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Corleto v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Shinkwin v. H. L. Green Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.