Staula v. Carrol
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
This is an action by a real estate broker to recover a commission. The facts appear in a report by a judge of the Municipal Court. The defendant employed the plaintiff to sell two pieces of real estate, and promised him as a commission all that he should obtain above $10,000. The plaintiff obtained a customer able, ready and willing to pay $10,500, but the defendant refused to sell. The plaintiff brought this action to recover $500. The judge *694found for the plaintiff in that sum, and the Appellate Division dismissed the report. The defendant appealed.
Ordinarily a broker earns a commission when…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Munroe v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- John T. Burns & Sons Inc. v. HandsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Cadigan v. CrabtreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Cohen v. AmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Spritz v. Brockton Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- E. A. Strout Realty Agency, Inc. v. GarganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Gaynor v. LaverdureMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Henderson & Beal, Inc. v. GlenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Shaw v. United Cape Cod Cranberry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Richards v. GilbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.