Legal Opinion

Staula v. Carrol

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 30, 1942PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

This is an action by a real estate broker to recover a commission. The facts appear in a report by a judge of the Municipal Court. The defendant employed the plaintiff to sell two pieces of real estate, and promised him as a commission all that he should obtain above $10,000. The plaintiff obtained a customer able, ready and willing to pay $10,500, but the defendant refused to sell. The plaintiff brought this action to recover $500. The judge *694found for the plaintiff in that sum, and the Appellate Division dismissed the report. The defendant appealed.

Ordinarily a broker earns a commission when…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Munroe v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  2. John T. Burns & Sons Inc. v. HandsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Cadigan v. CrabtreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  4. Cohen v. AmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. Spritz v. Brockton Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. E. A. Strout Realty Agency, Inc. v. GarganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  2. Gaynor v. LaverdureMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Henderson & Beal, Inc. v. GlenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  4. Shaw v. United Cape Cod Cranberry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  5. Richards v. GilbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API