Legal Opinion

Albert E. Touchet, Inc. v. Touchet

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 8, 1928PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

The plaintiff seeks (1) to compel, pursuant to one of its by-laws, the defendant, as administrator of the estate of Albert E. Touchet, to transfer to it one hundred of the one hundred and seventy-one shares of its capital stock formerly owned by the defendant’s intestate, (2) to restrain the defendant from prosecuting a petition for a *502writ of mandamus to compel the plaintiff to call the annual or a special meeting of its stockholders, (3) to restrain the defendant from voting any part of said one hundred and seventy-one shares of stock until the transfer to the plaintiff of said one hundred…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. New England Trust Co. v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  3. Elliott v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Luther v. C. J. Luther Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Cosmopolitan Trust Co. v. MitchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Spiegel v. Beacon Participations, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Crimmins & Peirce Co. v. Kidder Peabody Acceptance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Anderson v. BeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Brown v. Little, Brown & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API