Legal Opinion
Fink v. Dixon
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1955No. 33131PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.
The defendants Clarence G. Dixon and Harold W. Ellefson are partners and operate the Commercial Truck & Automotive Repair Service (hereinafter referred to as Commercial), a small automotive repair shop in the city of Spokane.
On July 24, 1953, the defendant System Tank Lines, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as System), brought a tank truck and trailer to Commercial for repairs, which included the welding of two hose carrier brackets on the side of the trailer. A System work order, specifying the work to be performed, was sent with the equipment and contained a statement that the tank trailer had…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kemalyan v. HendersonWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Pierce v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Lewis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Lamoreaux v. FosketWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Severns Motor Co. v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Mathis v. AmmonsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- State v. ReynoldsWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Titus v. Tacoma Smeltermen's Union Local No. 25Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Phillips v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1956
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.