Legal Opinion

Severns Motor Co. v. Hamilton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1950No. 31186PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

This action was instituted by Severns Motor Company, a corporation, against Kellis A. Hamilton, to recover damages done to its building. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant. The court granted a motion of plaintiff for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and its alternative motion for a new trial. The defendant has appealed.

The rule applicable to a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict of the jury in a negligence action is that it can only be granted (1) where the circumstances of the case are such that the standard of duty is fixed and the measure of duty defined by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burr v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Clark v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Richardson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Smith v. LeberWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Bell v. Northwest Cities Gas Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fink v. DixonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. System Tank Lines, Inc. v. DixonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Sullivan v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Johnson v. City of IlwacoWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Baltzelle v. Doces Sixth Avenue, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API