Legal Opinion

United States v. Batti

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 14, 2011No. 09-2050PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Luay Batti was convicted of improperly accessing information from a protected computer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(2)(C) and (c)(2)(B)(iii). He appeals the district court’s finding that the value of the information that he obtained exceeded $5,000 and the district court’s order of $47,565 in restitution. For the following reasons, we hold that the district court’s use of the cost of production of the information obtained here was a reasonable, and therefore permissible, method by which to determine the value of the information obtained by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. United States v. Henry A. BosticCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Albert C. Drebin, Budget Films, Inc., Lawrence S. Fine and Bruce M. VeneziaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. Daryl LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. EversCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  3. Roberts v. HamerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  5. Allen Ajan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API