Legal Opinion

Clubb v. Sentinel Life Insurance Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1935No. 25464. En BancPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Respondent had judgment in the court below upon the verdict of a jury in the full amount sued for, of $1,245, for permanent total disability benefits alleged to be due respondent. Appellant admitted that it owed respondent $394.28, which it tendered into court.

On April 4, 1929, a policy of accident insurance was issued to respondent, in which policy it was stated that his occupation was license inspector and his duties were “Inspector, office and traveling duties only.” The policy was kept in force until January or February, 1932, when respondent lost his employment as license inspector for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Storwick v. Reliance Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Nath v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Garver v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Elmore v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  5. Pederson v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jenner v. Real Estate ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Grandview Inland Fruit Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Clubb v. Sentinel Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API