Legal Opinion
Steele v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 9, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2014-1523PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge
Currently before the Court is the plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification [46], Upon consideration of the motion, plaintiffs’ opposition, defendant’s reply, the entire record herein, and the applicable law, the Court finds that plaintiffs have satisfied the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 23 as it relates to plaintiffs’ request for declaratory relief. The Court will certify the proposed class under FRCP 23(b)(2) for that portion of the case.
However, plaintiffs have not yet demonstrated that the Court…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Steele v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Garza v. HarganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Afghan and Iraqi Allies v. PompeoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Angelica S. v. U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Healthy Futures of Texas v. Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.