Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Anderson v. District Court

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 26, 1912No. Nos. 17,748—(254)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Writ of certiorari to review the order of the district court for Kandiyohi county, Powers, J., confirming the report of assessors appointed to assess damages and benefits caused by raising the waters of Foot lake to a uniform beigbt.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Certiorari to review the order of the district court of Kandiyohi county confirming the report of assessors appointed in proceedings under section 2552, et seq., R. L. 1905, to raise and maintain the waters of Foot lake at a fixed and uniform beigbt.

It appears from the record that Foot lake is a large navigable *133body of water, wholly within Kandiyohi county, covering an area of about fifteen hundred acres, and partly within the corporate limits of the city of Willmar, a city of forty-five hundred population. For many years the waters of the lake have gradually receded, either from natural…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Murtaugh v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. State ex rel. Beise v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. Stenberg v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. City of Hastings v. GillittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. KorrerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Anderson v. RaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State v. SlotnessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Mitchell v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  5. State ex rel. Swan Lake Area Wildlife Ass'n v. Nicollet County Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API