State Ex Rel. Freeling v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM, O.
This action was instituted in the district court of Oklahoma county by the plaintiff in error, as plaintiff against the defendant in error, as defendant.
The cause was tried upon an agreed statement of facts from which it appears, briefly stated, that one Claude Ray was in the employ of the School Land Department of the state between the 14th day of May, 1916, and the 19th day of May, 1917; as clerk in the office of the School Land Department; that on or about May 15, 1916, a bond was furnished, as required by law, protecting tbe state of Oklahoma against losses occasioned…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- DeJernette v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
- First National Bank v. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1902
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Citizens National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Fidelity Deposit Co. v. Champion Ice Mfg. & Cold Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Florida Cent. & P. R. v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brulatour v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Fourth & First Bank & Trust Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1925
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Leonard v. ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Docking v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.