Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Barber
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 13, 1934No. 6478PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
The appeal raises questions affecting the liability of an insurer and its extent, upon a so-ealled fidelity schedule bond, issued to a bank to indemnify it for losses sustained through dishonest or criminal acts of employees listed in schedules forming part of the bond. The appellant is the insurer, and the appellee receiver for the insured, who as plaintiff below obtained the judgment here reviewed.
The bond was originally written in 1927. It provided that, for consideration of a premium based upon an annual rate of 30 cents per $100 of insurance, the insurer bound…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First National Bank of DundeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. First Nat. Bank of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
- People v. KolowichMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- National City Bank v. National Security Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Commercial State Bank of RantoulDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Columbia Hospital for Women and Lying-In Asylum v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty CoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- A.B.S. Clothing Collection, Inc. v. Home InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Leonard v. ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Julius Seidel Lumber Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.