Mountain Shadows Resort Hotel v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Presiding Judge.
The primary issues raised by the petitioners (hereinafter collectively referred to as carrier) are whether the administrative law judge erred in allowing the respondent employee (claimant) to change physicians and whether there is evidence to support the administrative law judge’s award for a scheduled 100% loss of use of claimant’s right leg. In a request for affirmative relief, the claimant also urges that the award be set aside, contending that the administrative law judge erred in finding that his condition was stationary.
We consider first the issue…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coggins v. ElyArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- State Board of Barber Examiners v. WalkerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Dutra v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Itt Courier v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
3Cited by2 opinions
- Baudanza v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Lee v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993