Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Hoffman

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 9, 1956PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANLEY, Commissioner.

The appeal by Guy McCoy et al., is from a judgment that the appellees, Carl E. Hoffman and wife, have a passway over the land of the appellants and enjoining them from interfering with its use.

In 1938 Hoffman bought from Vaught Scites a small parcel of land situated on a state highway up Blackberry Fork of Pond Creek in Pike County. Scites covenanted to give his grantee “a necessary road off the hill to the state highway.” When the highway was reconstructed about the time of Hoffman’s purchase, the right of way was cut down so that the parcel *561was left on a high bluff and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. Carrollton Telephone Exchange Co. v. SpicerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Gibbs v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  4. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  5. Lambert v. HuntsmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cole v. GilvinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  2. Grinestaff v. GrinestaffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
  3. Holbrook v. TaylorKentucky Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Akers v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1958
  5. Poe v. GaunceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API