Legal Opinion
Poe v. Gaunce
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided November 4, 2011No. 2010-CA-001774-MRPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Judge:
The heirs of Roy Eugene Gaunce (the above-captioned appellees) and the heirs of Charles Gates (the above-captioned appellants) each sought declarations of their rights from the Nicholas Circuit Court re*771garding ownership of two burial sites and a monument located on a family cemetery plot in Nicholas County, Kentucky. The circuit court found in favor of the Gaunce heirs, and the Gates heirs now appeal. Finding no error, we affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Because this case deals with specifically designated burial sites and inscriptions in a monument, it is incumbent…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cole v. GilvinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
- Hook v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
- Roanoke Cemetery Co. v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
- Brunton v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Heiligman v. ChambersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Versailles v. Shirley Jane JohnsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2021