Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Marvin E. Jewell & Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1989No. 87-258PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Witthoff.D.J.

Dale A. Thomas filed a petition in the district court for Lancaster County seeking an accounting from his former partners in an accounting firm, Marvin E. Jewell & Company (Jewell & Co.). Jewell & Co. counterclaimed and sought damages resulting from Thomas’ alleged wrongful dissolution of the partnership. At trial, Jewell & Co. amended its counterclaim to include a cause of action on a promissory note.

The district court found Thomas’ accounting action was barred by the “unclean hands” doctrine, and awarded Jewell & Co. $264,095 on its counterclaim for wrongful dissolution. Jewell…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Frenzen v. TaylorNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hughes v. Enterprise Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Smith v. DaubNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State Ex Rel. Douglas v. MorrowNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Marvin E. Jewell & Co. v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Giger v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. McCook National Bank v. MyersNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Sullivan, Bodney & Hammond, PC v. BodneyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
  4. Detter v. Miracle Hills Animal Hosp., PCNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Hurwitz v. PaddenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API