Legal Opinion

Marvin E. Jewell & Co. v. Thomas

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1989No. 87-028PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Plaintiff-appellant, Marvin E. Jewell & Company (Jewell), a partnership, filed this action against defendant-appellee, Dale A. Thomas, seeking damages of $141,000 plus interest, representing payments made by Jewell to the Union Bank and Trust Company (Union Bánk) in paying off a promissory note. Jewell alleged that it paid the note only after Thomas did not pay it when due and that Thomas, as a party accommodated, owed the amount of the note to Jewell.

Thomas, in his amended answer, denied he was a “party accommodated” and alleged that any amount paid by Jewell to Union Bank was in payment of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Farmers State Bank v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. Boren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Lauritzen v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Dalton v. George B. Hatley Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Holcomb State Bank v. AdamsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ashland State Bank v. Elkhorn Racquetball, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Borley Storage & Transfer Co. v. WhittedNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Rodehorst v. GartnerNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Professional Recruiters, Inc. v. OliverNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. International Harvester Credit Corp. v. LechNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API