Legal Opinion

Pearson v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 8, 1923No. 6 Div. 804PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The original complaint, with few, hut important, changes and omissions, is a copy of the Code form in actions of unlawful detainer. Civil Code 1907, vol. 2, p. 1200, form 27. This complaint was stricken on demurrer of defendant. Thereupon plaintiff filed an amended complaint in statutory ejectment. Civil Code 1907, vol. 2, p. 1200, form 29.

Defendant’s objection to filing, motion to strike, and demurrer to the amended complaint were overruled. * The point here made is that the amendment presented a new cause of action, or worked an entire change of the cause of action.

Section 5367, Code of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alabama Consolidated Coal & Iron Co. v. HealdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Crawford v. MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Brown v. LoebSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Ballenger v. BallengerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. City of Birmingham v. ShirleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Clark v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Wiggins v. Stewart Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Esslinger v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Employers Ins. Co. of Alabama, Inc. v. BrockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. DupreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API