Legal Opinion · Dissent

General Motors Corp. v. Motor Vehicle Review Board

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 3, 2005No. 4-04-0735Published

1Dissent

PRESIDING JUSTICE COOK,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent.

Plaintiff General Motors Corporation decided to add a GMC franchise at Jacobs Twin Buick on Chicago’s west side and another at Loren Pontiac-Buick in Glenview. In February and March 2001, pursuant to the Franchise Act (815 ILCS 710/1 through 32 (West 2000)), General Motors notified its existing franchisees in the 10-mile relevant market area of its intention to grant the additional franchises. 815 ILCS 710/4(e)(8) (West 2000) (“notice”); 815 ILCS 710/2(q) (West 2000) (“relevant market area”). Defendants Grossinger Autoplex, Inc., Castle…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Belvidere v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Fields Jeep-Eagle, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. General Motors Corp. v. O'Daniel Oldsmobile, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Crossroads Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. Sterling Truck Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA v. SmitDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API