Fields Jeep-Eagle, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp.
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW
In these consolidated direct appeals (134 Ill. 2d R. 302), we are presented with the question of the constitutionality of sections 4(e)(8) and 12(c) of the Motor Vehicle Franchise Act (the Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 1211/2, pars. 754(e)(8), 762(c) (now codified as 815 ILCS 710/4(e)(8), 12(c) (West 1992))). The two judges before whom these now consolidated cases were heard each declared those sections unconstitutional on the bases that they violate the constitutional principles of separation of powers and due process.
STATUTORY SCHEME
In section 1.1 of the Act, the legislature finds and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- New Motor Vehicle Bd. of Cal. v. Orrin W. Fox Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Federal Power Commission v. Idaho Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Sanford v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Keller v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- General Motors Corp. v. State of Illinois Motor Vehicle Review BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
- Murneigh v. GainerIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Crossroads Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. Sterling Truck Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2011
- People Ex Rel. Devine v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.