Schaaf v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Case Summary
VAIDIK, Chief Judge.
[1] Joshua Schaaf appeals his convictions and sentence for two counts of dealing heroin. We conclude that the State presented sufficient evidence to support Schaafs convictions. However, we find that his forty-year sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of his offenses. Therefore, we remand this matter to the trial court with instructions to impose a sentence of thirty years.
Facts and Procedural History
[2] The basic facts are undisputed. The charges against Schaaf arose from his role in two controlled drug buys. In April 2014, Schaaf drove Randall…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cardwell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Wieland v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Brian M. Marley v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Walker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Shawn Wilson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Larry C. Perry, Jr. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Arrion Walton v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Anna M. Bischoff v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Arrion Walton v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Brooke D. Shelton v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.