Legal Opinion

Triumph Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Alamance Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1962No. 8374_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

299 F.2d 793

TRIUMPH HOSIERY MILLS, INC., Hudson Hosiery Company, Burlington Industries, Inc., Claussner Hosiery Company, and McCallum Hosiery Company, Appellees and Cross-Appellants,

v.

ALAMANCE INDUSTRIES, INC., Kayser-Roth Corporation, and Kayser-Roth Hosiery Company, Inc., Appellants and Cross-Appellees.

No. 8374.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued October 12, 1961.

Decided February 8, 1962.

Simon H. Rifkind, New York City (Jay H. Topkis, New York City, Welch Jordan, Greensboro, N. C., Paul B. Bell, Charlotte, N. C., Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, John G. Simon, John…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Kenneth Reiner and Frank A. Klaus, Jr., D/B/A Kaynar Company and Kaynar Mfg. Co., Inc. v. I. Leon Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API