Legal Opinion
In Re Mitchell
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 8, 2003No. 02-BG-772PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Respondent Gregory C. Mitchell takes exception to the recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility (“The Board”) that he be suspended from the practice of law for ninety days for violating the following Rules of Professional Conduct: Rule 1.15(b); 1 Rule 4.1(a), 2 and Rule 8.4(c). 3 We accept the Board’s recommendation and suspend Mr. Mitchell from the practice of law for ninety days.
FACTUAL SUMMARY
The record before us shows that the disciplinary action against Mr. Mitchell, a member of the District of Columbia Bar since 1980, grew out of his initial representation of his wife…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re S.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Matter of ShorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Matter of JamesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- In Re TempleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re BaileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In re Barry J. NaceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In Re BaileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In re Berhan DargieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- In re DargieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017