Legal Opinion

Schumpert v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 30, 1940PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownoyer, J.

These two actions were tried together in the Circuit Court by agreement, and only one bill of exceptions and assignment of errors were filed in this court.

India Moore’s action is to recover (1) damages for being forcibly ejected from a house which she and her husband were occupying as tenants, and (2) damages for an assault which caused her to suffer a miscarriage.

Robert Moore’s action is for (1) damages for being forcibly ejected, and (2) for loss of services of his wife and medical expenses as the result of the ejectment and assault.

The defendants pleaded the general issue of not guilty in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tyrus v. Kansas City, Ft. Scott & Memphis RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Tennessee Central Railway Co. v. UmenstetterTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Elmore v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1931
  4. Pierce v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Fly v. SwinkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. CobbleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  2. White v. SeierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  3. Pearl v. Pic Walsh Freight Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Wesco Paving Co. v. NashCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
  5. Archer v. ArcherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API