Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Code

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 17, 2016No. 111250D9; A154916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.

Husband appeals a judgment of dissolution, arguing that the trial court erred in its property division and in awarding attorney fees to wife. Specifically, with respect to the property division, husband argues that the trial court erred in setting the value of his podiatry practice that was subject to equitable division. We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in making the property division or the award of attorney fees to wife. Based on that conclusion, we do not reach wife’s conditional cross-assignment of error, and, accordingly, we affirm.

Neither party requests that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Matter of Marriage of MasseeOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In re the Marriage of MortonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. In re the Marriage of NimanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of KotlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. In re MaldonadoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. In re SchwindtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. In re the Marriage of CelanoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. Pardovich and PardovichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API