Legal Opinion
Alexandria Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Rost
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 21, 2008No. A07-1620PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHNSON, Judge.
The Alexandria Housing and Redevelopment Authority (AHRA) terminated the employment of Judith Rost, its executive director. Rost petitioned the Bureau of Mediation Services (BMS) for independent review of her termination pursuant to section 179A.25 of the Minnesota Statutes. After an evidentiary hearing, a BMS-approved arbitrator ordered AHRA to reinstate Rost with back pay. AHRA challenges BMS’s statutory authority to review the termination as well as the merits of the arbitrator’s decision. We conclude that section 179A.25 does not authorize BMS to conduct an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Coursolle v. EMC Insurance Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Ruffenach v. Metro. CouncilCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019