Legal Opinion
ING Global v. United Parcel Service Oasis Supply Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 30, 2014No. 13-489-cvPublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Circuit Judge:
In October 2012, following a six-day trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff, ING Global (“ING”), on its breach of contract claims. The jury also awarded ING attorney’s fees, to be set the court, as permitted by Georgia law which governed the contract. Despite its failure to have moved pursuant to Rule 50(a) for judgment as a matter of law prior to the submission of the case to the jury, defendant, United Parcel Service Oasis Supply Corporation (“UPS”), subsequently moved pursuant to Rule 59(e) to amend the judgment to set aside the award…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Lore v. City of SyracuseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Ricky Baker v. David Alan DorfmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Theodore Rothstein v. Mark Carriere, and Multi-Media Distributing Co. Inc., Leisure Time Entertainment, Inc., and Leisure Time Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Audrey Jacques, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Dimarzio, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Book Dog Books, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Edelman v. NYU LangoneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025
- Graham v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Beastie Boys v. Monster Energy Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Rucks v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.