Legal Opinion
United States v. Agronics Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 22, 1999No. 94-2258PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff United States of America brought this action to recover a civil penalty imposed by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) against defendant Agronics, Incorporated in connection with its operation of a húmate mining and processing facility in Sandoval County, New Mexico. Under the applicable statutory scheme, the district court had limited jurisdiction to order payment of this administratively final and conclusive penalty, without collateral review of the merits. See 30 U.S.C. §§ 816(a)(1), 820(j). In response, Agronics filed a counterclaim…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Art metal-u.s.a., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Johnson v. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Jayvee Brand, Inc. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Yu Kikumura v. OsagieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Loughlin v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Cortez v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
- Coffey v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.