Legal Opinion
Sinclair Pipe Line Co. v. Archer County
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided November 28, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 1010PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLEY, District Judge.
The plaintiff sued defendant to recover reimbursement of expenses totaling over $5,000 incurred in adapting some segments of an existing oil pipe line to certain public highway widening and construction projects, and additional relief was sought by declaratory judgment.
Under the terms of Title 116, Art. 6674q-4, in Vernon’s Civil Statutes of Texas, all improvements to the State Highway System “shall be made under the exclusive and direct control of the State Highway Department and with appropriations made by the Legislature out of the State Highway Fund. * * * No…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Washington Ex Rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. FairchildSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- F. J. Harrison & Co. v. BoringTexas Supreme Court · 1875
- City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Gabbert v. City of BrownwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- County of Harris v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Tenneco, Inc. v. MayDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1974
- McLennan County v. Sinclair Pipe Line CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Hardin County, Texas v. Trunkline Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Sinclair Pipe Line Company v. Archer County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.