Legal Opinion

Miller v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 19, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

*345Contrary to the petitioners’ contention, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the respondents’ motion which was to dismiss the proceeding. The petitioners may not seek judicial review of the respondents’ placement of them on a lower salary line because they failed to exhaust their administrative remedies under the parties’ collective bargaining agreement (see Young Men’s Christian Assn. v Rochester Pure Waters Dist., 37 NY2d 371, 375; Kropp v Incorporated Vil. of Freeport, 277 AD2d 289; Albala v County of Nassau, 270 AD2d 482). To the extent that the petitioners’ claims fall…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Rochester Pure Waters DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Picciano v. Nassau County Civil Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Albala v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Kropp v. Incorporated Village of FreeportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API