Legal Opinion
Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Rochester Pure Waters District
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 2, 1975PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGabrielli, J.
The principal issue is whether petitioner having failed to exercise its right to appeal to the board of supervisors, as provided by statute, from respondent Rochester Pure Waters District’s administrative determination fixing water pollution control charges, may now properly contend for the first time, that, by reason of claimed Real Property Tax Law exemptions afforded charitable organizations, it is immune from certain of the charges levied by respondent pursu*374ant to section 266 of the County Law. This section provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "1. Subject to confirmation by the board…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Diocese of Rochester v. Planning BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Buffalo Hebrew Christian Mission, Inc. v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- N. H. Lyons & Co. v. CorsiNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Rochester Pure Waters DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
3Cited by123 opinions
- Watergate II Apartments v. Buffalo Sewer AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- MATTER OF YARBOUGH v. FrancoNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Aldrich v. PattisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Nelson v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Hurlbut v. WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.