Legal Opinion

Westmoreland Specialty Co. v. Missouri Glass Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court.. — lion.. Hugo Muench, Judge. (1) Sec. 1026, R. S. 1899 (See. 3040, R. S. 1909) has to do only with foreign corporations “doing business in Missouri.” Pláintiff did not do business in Missouri. The sale was made and performed in Pennsylvania. Textbook Co. v. Gillespie, 229 Mo. 397 Shoe Mach. Co. v. Ramlose, 231 Mo. 539 ; Engine Co. v. Apartment Co., 154 Mo. App. 139; Koenig v. Boat Co.,. 155 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court.. — lion.. Hugo Muench, Judge. (1) Sec. 1026, R. S. 1899 (See. 3040, R. S. 1909) has to do only with foreign corporations “doing business in Missouri.” Pláintiff did not do business in Missouri. The sale was made and performed in Pennsylvania. Textbook Co. v. Gillespie, 229 Mo. 397 Shoe Mach. Co. v. Ramlose, 231 Mo. 539 ; Engine Co. v. Apartment Co., 154 Mo. App. 139; Koenig v. Boat Co.,. 155 Mo. App. 685: Corn Products Co. v. Supply Co., 156 Mo. App. 110. (2) Sec. 8965 to 8970, R. S. 1899 (Sec. 10298, et seq., R. S. 1909), apply to corporations…

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, P. J.

This action was originally commenced before a justice of the peace on an account claimed to be due plaintiff by defendant. In that court defendant filed an answer, which, after a general denial, sets up that plaintiff was not authorized or licensed to transact business in the State of Missouri at the time covered by the account in suit and on that ground is not entitled to maintain the suit. Further answering, it is averred that at the time set out in plaintiff’s statement and. at the dates mentioned in the account attached to the statement, defendant made the purchase from plaintiff of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex inf. Hadley v. Delmar Jockey ClubSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. International Text-Book Co. v. GillespieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  3. United Shoe Machinery Co. v. RamloseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  4. State v. WingfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. State v. RosenbergerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First National Bank v. Missouri Glass Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API