Cilek v. Office of the Minn. Sec'y of State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWorke, Judge
Appellants challenge the district court's grant of summary judgment to respondents, and denial of their summary-judgment motion, on respondents' claim that appellants unlawfully refused to disclose certain voter data that respondents requested under the MGDPA. Because we conclude that the data requested by respondents, and not produced by appellants, are public data, we affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Minnesota Voters Alliance's stated objective is to ensure confidence in the integrity of Minnesota elections. Respondent Andrew Cilek is its executive director (respondents referred to collectively as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Dynamic Air, Inc. v. BlochCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.