Legal Opinion

Cilek v. Office of the Minn. Sec'y of State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 15, 2019No. A18-1140Published

1Opinion of the CourtWorke, Judge

Appellants challenge the district court's grant of summary judgment to respondents, and denial of their summary-judgment motion, on respondents' claim that appellants unlawfully refused to disclose certain voter data that respondents requested under the MGDPA. Because we conclude that the data requested by respondents, and not produced by appellants, are public data, we affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Minnesota Voters Alliance's stated objective is to ensure confidence in the integrity of Minnesota elections. Respondent Andrew Cilek is its executive director (respondents referred to collectively as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Star Centers, Inc. v. Faegre & Benson, L.L.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. Dynamic Air, Inc. v. BlochCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API