National Transport Corp. v. Tug Abqaiq
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
The findings are not clearly erroneous. On the contrary the testimony and the exhibits do no more than present the usual questions of fact, and Judge Cooper has stated the factual issues and disposed of them in a comprehensive and lucid opinion, reported at 294 F.Supp. 1080 (S.D.N.Y.1968). The critical finding is the one rejecting the version of the docking operation testified to by Jaber Mohammed, captain of the Tug Abqaiq I, who appeared in person at the trial. Judge Cooper did not believe Mohammed and he credited the testimony of appellee’s witnesses, who described the pounding of the stem…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- The Steamer WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- The W. G. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
- The AnacondaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- The Clarence P. HowlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- The Andros Shipping Co., Ltd. v. Panama Canal Company, and Empresa Nacional Del Petroleo, Empresa Nacional Del Petroleo v. Panama Canal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harbor Tug & Barge, Inc., a Corporation v. Belcher Towing Company, Belcher Towing Company, Third Party v. Carl N. Brown, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Mid-America Transportation Co. v. Rose Barge Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1972
- National Transport Corp. v. The Tug AbqaiqCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969