Legal Opinion
Mid-America Transportation Co. v. Rose Barge Lines, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided June 29, 1972No. 70 A 611 (3)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
347 F.Supp. 566 (1972)
MID-AMERICA TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff,
v.
ROSE BARGE LINES, INC., a corporation, in personam,
and
the M/V MARK EASTIN, its engines, boilers, tackle, equipment, etc., in rem,
and
M/G Transport Services, Inc., a corporation, in personam, Defendants.
No. 70 A 611 (3).
United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.
June 29, 1972.
Lucas & Murphy, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.
Coburn, Croft, Shepherd & Herzog, St. Louis, Mo., for defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WEBSTER, District Judge.
This is a case of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction pursuant to Rule…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Stevens v. the White CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- The UmbriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- The SeveranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
- The LackawannaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mid-America Transportation Company, Inc. v. National Marine Service, Inc., and M/v National Progress, Her Engines,boilers, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Pillsbury Co. v. Midland Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1989
- Mid-America Transportation Co. v. Rose Barge Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Massman Construction Co. v. Sioux City & New Orleans Barge Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1979
- In Re American Milling Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.