Petric v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Chief Judge.
The Maryland General Assembly, in 1959, enacted a statute which proscribed the use of electronic devices for the purpose of overhearing or recording private conversation unless the parties to that conversation consented. The consent could be either expressed or implied. 1959 Md. Laws, ch. 706. That statute, in substance, remains the law of Maryland. Maryland Courts & Judicial Proceedings Code Ann. § 10-402 provides, in pertinent part:
“(a) Unlawful acts. — Except as otherwise specifically provided in this subtitle it is unlawful for any person to:(1) Wilfully intercept,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Stevenson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- United States v. Isadore MarionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- State v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Montgomery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Hawes v. CarberryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Ricks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- 110OAG40, Maryland Attorney General Reports2025
- Maryland Attorney General Opinion 110OAG40, Maryland Attorney General Reports2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.