Legal Opinion

Mowry v. Shumway

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 15, 1877PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Writ of error from a judgment of the Superior Court in Windham County. The original action, which was brought by the defendant in error, was assumpsit on a note, and was tried to the court before Carpenter, J. The note was for $1,650, was dated July 31,1873, and was payable in three years, with interest payable quarterly at the rate of seven per cent, per annum. The defendant pleaded the general issue with notice of usury.

Read the full summary

Writ of error from a judgment of the Superior Court in Windham County. The original action, which was brought by the defendant in error, was assumpsit on a note, and was tried to the court before Carpenter, J. The note was for $1,650, was dated July 31,1873, and was payable in three years, with interest payable quarterly at the rate of seven per cent, per annum. The defendant pleaded the general issue with notice of usury. The suit was brought before the principal of the note was due and for interest only, and the court rendered judgment for the full amount of the interest in arrear. By…

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

We think it clear, upon principle and author*494ity, that there isj no foundation for the claim mude hy the plaintiff in error. The interest, reserved in the note was, the legal rate according to the statute then in force, and. the fact that the defendant agreed, to, pay the.- interest quarterly could not make the interest usurious. The whole interest on the note would amount to $415.50 per year, One quarter of it would be $2.8.87, apd of course at the- end of the year the defendant would only have paid $115.5Q; and although it might, be true that the plaintiff, hy putting the quarterly- payments…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Bridgeport v. Housatonuc RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1843
  2. Brooks v. HollandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1851

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. DottenheimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Pendergrass v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. Galveston & Houston Investment Co. v. GrymesTexas Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API