Legal Opinion

Pendergrass v. New York Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 16, 1927No. 5407PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

(After stating the foregoing fatíts.) The trial judge directed a verdict for the defendants. A motion for new trial was based on the usual general grounds and two special grounds. Exceptions pendente lite were filed to the sustaining in part of certain demurrers filed by the defendants to the petition, and error is assigned thereon in the bill of exceptions; but in the brief of the plaintiff in error the only questions argued are upon *677the rulings of the court in holding that this was not an usurious transaction, and in excluding the evidence of Mrs. Pendergrass and Lonnie Eubanks, tending to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Leffler Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. DottenheimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Goodrich v. Reynolds, Wilder & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Dakin v. DemmingNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
  5. Skinner v. BraswellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wardlaw v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  2. Byrd v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Meeks v. WithersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  4. Byrd v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Magid v. BeaverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API