Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Temple

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 21, 1994No. 93-1490-E-1; CA A82008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

The parties submitted this case to the trial court pursuant to ORCP 66. Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s judgment determining that, having pursued to final judgment a property damages claim against defendant arising out of an automobile accident, plaintiff is barred by claim preclusion from bringing this claim for personal injuries arising out of the same automobile accident.

Relying on our opinion in Andrews v. Christenson, 71 Or App 442, 692 P2d 687 (1984), rev den 299 Or 37 (1985), plaintiff contends that the trial court erred. In Andrews, we held, in a 7-to-3 decision in banc, that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Rennie v. Freeway TransportOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Dean v. Exotic Veneers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Troutman v. ErlandsonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Winters v. BisaillonOregon Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peterson v. TempleOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Steele v. a & B Automotive & Towing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Peterson v. TempleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API