Cone v. Johnston
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Wyatt, Justice.
1. “The court of ordinary has original and exclusive jurisdiction over the probate of wills, and the issue to be decided on an application for probate is devisavit vel non, and does not include any issue as to the validity of the testator’s title. Civil Code, §§ 3853, 3856; Wetter v. Habersham, 60 Ga. 193. The statute provides for an appeal to the superior court from the judgment of the court of ordinary admitting or refusing the probate of a paper as a will; and when such an appeal is taken to the superior court, that court becomes quoad hoc a probate court. Barksdale v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dix v. DixSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Field v. BrantleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Wetter v. HabershamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
- Finch v. FinchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
- Walden v. MahnksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Langan v. CheshireSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Thomas v. RoughtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Lee v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Lackey v. LackeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Byrd v. RiggsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.